04 - Business structure and PM.

 0    23 フィッシュ    michallekawa
mp3をダウンロードする 印刷 遊びます 自分をチェック
 
質問 English 答え English
Information needs in Functional* organisations:
*centralised
学び始める
Data aggregated at the highest level before feedback given.
Performance information required by entity's top for planning and control.
Information needs in Divisional* organisations:
*decentralised
学び始める
Information needs to be available lower down organisation due to the high level of autonomy.
Advantages for PM in Functional organisations:
*centralised
3
学び始める
Path of career defined and sense of belonging for specialists. | Standardisation and control better. The IS should aid this communication. | Lower costs since roles are not duplicated.
PSL
Advantages for PM in Divisional* organisations:
3
*decentralised
学び始める
Local needs tailoring of PM| Assessment of divisional performance easier*. | Growing and diversifying of organisation easier.
LAG
*The IS should deliver the correct information to divisional managers, in an appropriate form on timely basis.
Problems for PM in Functional organisations:
#
学び始める
Dysfunctional behaviour of managers. | Individual products or market performance difficult to assess. | Growing and diversifying harder. | Slow decision making.
DIGS
Problems for PM in Divisional organisations:
3
学び始める
Transfer pricing.| Duplication of functions.| Goal congruence lacking.
TDG (Transport Development Group)
Network organisation - Information needs.
3
3
学び始める
Feedback of own performance for each party. | Establishing of shared goals agreements. | Decision making information for those responsible for regulating performance.
FED
The Information system need to be sophisticated with the ability to gather and process the information from all parties.
Network organisation - Advantages for PM:
#
学び始める
Larger organisation competition enabling. | Infrastructure costs lower. | Flexibility to meet project needs. | Exploitation of market opportunities.
LIFE
Network organisation - Disadvantages for PM.
#
学び始める
Competitive advantage loss if partner works for competitors. | Agreeing of the common goals. | Planning. | ISs not compatible. | Employees monitoring difficult.
CAPIE
Reasons for creating Joint venture structures:
4
学び始める
Costs and risks sharing. | Resources of partner tapping. | Expertise of partner tapping. | Markets and products expanding.
CREM
to tap - wykorzystać
Join venture - difficulties:
#
学び始める
Decisions about items* sharing.| ISs incompatible.| Accountability attributing. | Legal requirements. | Opinions different**. | Goals. | Security of information. | Culture, language, time or currency differences.
DIALOGS-C
*Sharing of profits, costs, resources, decision making, etc. | **Opinions about quality, cost control or risk management.
Strategic alliance - reason for establishing:
学び始める
Similar to joint venture* but a separate business entity is not formed, allowing greater flexibility.
*CREM
Strategic alliance - difficulties:
2
学び始める
Independence is retained, making it difficult to put common performance measures in place and to collect and analyse management information. | Plus many of the difficulties of Joint ventures (DIALOGS-C)...
Problems of multinational organisations:
3
学び始める
Co-ordination of subsidiaries. | Exchange rates and other uncertainties. | Measuring of performance difficult if common systems don't exist.
CEM
Business integration definition:
2
学び始める
All aspects of the business aligned to secure the most efficient use of the entity's resources so that it can achievable its objectives effectively. | Processes are viewed as complete entities from initial order to final delivery.
'aspects of the business aligned' | 'Processes viewed as complete entities'
Value chain analysis
#
学び始める
Inbound logistics. | Operations. | Outbound logistics. | Marketing and sales. | Service.
and secondary activities: Firm infrastructure. | HR management. | Technology development. | Procurement. (FHTP)
The value chain model is based around ACTIVITIES rather than functional departments. It shows how each activity adds to competitive advantage. The model emphasises linkages and CSFs within activities and for the value chain as a whole.
McKinsey's 7s model:
#
McKinsey's 7s model describes an organisation as consisting of seven interrelated internal elements:
学び始める
Shared valueS. | SystemS. | SkillS. | StructurE. | StylE. | Staff. | Strategy.
SSSEEFY
Business process re-engineering (BPR) definition:
3cz
学び始める
The fundamental rethinking | and radical redesign | of business processes.
BPR cuts across traditional departmental lines:
4 (imformative)
学び始める
Change to process view will require change in culture with a move to process teams and not functional departments. | Employees will need to retrain. | Communication and leadership from senior management essential. | Results in more use of IT.
BPR may result in improved organisational performance:
5 (informative)
学び始める
Core processes adapted to achieve corporate goals. | Resolves around customer needs - key to competitive advantage. | Allows workers more autonomy. | Can help eliminate unnecessary activities. Process should be made cheaper.
Practical problems of BPR:
6 (informative)
学び始める
Additional costs.*| Perception that BPR is all about cost cutting.| Staff may feel devaluated if role changes.| Less of control if middle managers removed.| May utilise outsourcing.**| May result in automation of processes but not redesign.
*such as new IS or training. | **With potential quality and flexibility problems.
BPR - Changes to PM system:
2
学び始める
Systems redesignated to capture new PM data in real time. | Reward system aligned to new measures.
RR
BPR is intended to achieve dramatic improvements in critical, contemporary measures of performance such as:
3
学び始める
quality* | costs, | and speed.
QCS
*also quality of service.

コメントを投稿するにはログインする必要があります。