質問 |
答え |
学び始める
|
|
All knowledge originates in experiences and is derived through senses Understand subjectively meaningful experiences
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Social world can be studied in terms of invariant laws Only observable phenomena can be counted as knowledge Produce law-like propositions
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Knowledge about the world can be acquired in other ways than direct observation Perceptions relate to human perceptions as well Stress both interpretation and observation
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Philosophy that tries to categorise all existing things
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Distinction between the way the world actually is and the meaning / interpretation people assign to it
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Material features shape the real world. Not values/beliefs/experiences
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Reality is only knowable through the human mind and socially constructed meanings
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Ways of learning/knowing about the social world
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Research cannot be value free so researchers should make assumptions transparent
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
An observation is true if it leads to actions that produce the desired or predicted results
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Looking for patterns and association derived from observations
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Propositions or hypotheses are reached theoretically through a logically derived process (using evidence)
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Qual and quan should not be seen as competing and contradictory But as complementary strategies for different types of RQs
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Aim of testing, generating, or enhancing thinking within a particular discipline
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Using acquired knowledge to contribute directly to the understanding / resolution of a contemporary issue
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
What exists, phenomena, interest
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Why it exists, linkages among actors, events
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
The effectiveness of what exists (actual, not intended), hypothesis, propsition, inquiry
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Aiding the development of theories/strategies/actions
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Impact of intervention or policy in terms of effectiveness and the different outcomes that have resulted
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Developed to allow investigation of phenomena in their natural settings
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Join study population to record actions
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Record actions without becoming a member
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Construction of texts and verbal accounts to explore systems of social meaning
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Detailed examination of talk in interaction to determine how conversation is constructed and enacted
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Involves construction and requires re-processing and re-telling of attitudes, beliefs, behaviour
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Mixing quan and qual methods. Not focus on outputs, but to yield different types of intelligence about the subject
|
|
|
Preceding statistical research 学び始める
|
|
Performing qual before quan When subject is complex (form hypotheses)
|
|
|
Alongside statistical research 学び始める
|
|
Perform qual and quan simultaneously Study different phenomena in the same field of interest
|
|
|
As a follow-up to statistical research 学び始める
|
|
Perform qual after quan When quan needs further detail, explanation or indepth info
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
1. Development of RQs 2. design, settings population 3. time, data collection 4. Choice of data collection 5. Negotiation of research relationships
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
People are interviewed more than once
|
|
|
Repeat cross-sectional studies 学び始める
|
|
Subsequent samples of new participants are interviewed
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Elements in population are chosen at random
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Units are deliberately selected. Sample is not intended to be statistically representative
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Sample units are chosen because they have particular features which will enable detailed exploration and understanding of the subject
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Give a detailed picture of a particular phenomenon
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Include phenomena which vary widely from each other to identify the central themes that cut across the variety of cases
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Cases are unusual or special enlightening
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Extreme cases of specific phenomena of interest
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Cases which characterise positions that are normal or average are selected to provide detailed profiling
|
|
|
Stratified purposive sampling 学び始める
|
|
Select groups that display variation so that subgroups can be compared
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Cases demonstrate a phenomenon or dramatic position
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Sample units are chosen on the basis of their potential contribution to the development and testing of theoretical constructs
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
No new data is obtained through expanding the sample
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Take advantage of unforeseen opportunities
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Samples chosen according to ease of access
|
|
|
学び始める
|
|
Gives individuals the opportunity to indicate that they don’t want their details to be passed on to the research team
|
|
|